of 13
All materials on our website are shared by users. If you have any questions about copyright issues, please report us to resolve them. We are always happy to assist you.

Phylogeny and evolutionary history of glycogen synthase kinase 3/SHAGGY-like kinase genes in land plants

Category:

Public Notices

Publish on:

Views: 32 | Pages: 13

Extension: PDF | Download: 0

Share
Description
Qi et al. BMC Evolutionary Biology 2013, 13:143 RESEARCH ARTICLE Open Access Phylogeny and evolutionary history of glycogen synthase kinase 3/SHAGGY-like kinase genes in land plants Xinshuai Qi 1,2,3,
Transcript
Qi et al. BMC Evolutionary Biology 2013, 13:143 RESEARCH ARTICLE Open Access Phylogeny and evolutionary history of glycogen synthase kinase 3/SHAGGY-like kinase genes in land plants Xinshuai Qi 1,2,3, André S Chanderbali 3,4*, Gane Ka-Shu Wong 5,6,7, Douglas E Soltis 3 and Pamela S Soltis 4 Abstract Background: GSK3 (glycogen synthase kinase 3) genes encode signal transduction proteins with roles in a variety of biological processes in eukaryotes. In contrast to the low copy numbers observed in animals, GSK3 genes have expanded into a multi-gene family in land plants (embryophytes), and have also evolved functions in diverse plant specific processes, including floral development in angiosperms. However, despite previous efforts, the phylogeny of land plant GSK3 genes is currently unclear. Here, we analyze genes from a representative sample of phylogenetically pivotal taxa, including basal angiosperms, gymnosperms, and monilophytes, to reconstruct the evolutionary history and functional diversification of the GSK3 gene family in land plants. Results: Maximum Likelihood phylogenetic analyses resolve a gene tree with four major gene duplication events that coincide with the emergence of novel land plant clades. The single GSK3 gene inherited from the ancestor of land plants was first duplicated along the ancestral branch to extant vascular plants, and three subsequent duplications produced three GSK3 loci in the ancestor of euphyllophytes, four in the ancestor of seed plants, and at least five in the ancestor of angiosperms. A single gene in the Amborella trichopoda genome may be the sole survivor of a sixth GSK3 locus that originated in the ancestor of extant angiosperms. Homologs of two Arabidopsis GSK3 genes with genetically confirmed roles in floral development, AtSK11 and AtSK12, exhibit floral preferential expression in several basal angiosperms, suggesting evolutionary conservation of their floral functions. Members of other gene lineages appear to have independently evolved roles in plant reproductive tissues in individual taxa. Conclusions: Our phylogenetic analyses provide the most detailed reconstruction of GSK3 gene evolution in land plants to date and offer new insights into the origins, relationships, and functions of family members. Notably, the diversity of this green branch of the gene family has increased in concert with the increasing morphological and physiological complexity of land plant life forms. Expression data for seed plants indicate that the functions of GSK3 genes have also diversified during evolutionary time. Keywords: GSK3, Land plant evolution, Gene duplication, Gene expression Background Glycogen synthase kinase 3 (GSK3) proteins, also known as SHAGGY-like kinases, have important roles in a wide range of cellular processes throughout eukaryotes [1]. In animal development, products of GSK3 homologs participate in the critically important Wnt signaling pathway that regulates cellular differentiation, patterning, and growth in perhaps all metazoans [2]. The GSK3 homolog in the * Correspondence: 3 Department of Biology, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA 4 Florida Museum of Natural History, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA Full list of author information is available at the end of the article protozoan Dictyostelium discoideum is also involved in the regulation of development [3]. Recognition of possible roles of GSK3 in human disease has prompted recent interest in these genes in the field of medicine [1,4]. Compared to animals, GSK3 genes have radiated into a relatively large multi-gene family in land plants [5-7]. For example, five GSK3 genes have been reported from the moss Physcomitrella patens [8], and 10 GSK3 genes are present in the genome sequence of the flowering plant Arabidopsis thaliana [5]. Conceivably, therefore, GSK3 genes have had a dynamic history of gene duplication during the course of land plant evolution. They have also 2013 Qi et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. Qi et al. BMC Evolutionary Biology 2013, 13:143 Page 2 of 13 acquired roles in plant-specific processes. For example, different Arabidopsis GSK3 genes function in hormonal signaling, osmotic stress responses [1], and flower development [6,9]. Previous phylogenetic analyses suggest that four major lineages evolved in the land plant branch of the GSK3 gene family [7], but their origins and relationships are currently unclear. Physcomitrella GSK3 genes occupy different positions relative to groups of angiosperm genes in various analyses [8,10], and the positions of fern and gymnosperm GSK3 sequences have been similarly fluid (Figures five to seven in [10]). Such topological instabilities may be an indication of inadequate sampling, which is often a problem in phylogenetic reconstruction [11], particularly in gene family analyses in which both taxonomic and gene copy representation may be sparse. For example, only three plant genomes were available to Yoo et al. [10], and ferns and gymnosperms were represented by just seven sequences in their data set. Currently, 35 land plant genomes are publically accessible through the Phytozome v9.0 portal [12]. We also have a draft genome sequence for Amborella trichopoda, which occupies a pivotal phylogenetic position as sister to all other extant flowering plants [13]. In addition, the Ancestral Angiosperm Genome (http://ancangio.uga.edu/) and 1KP (http://www.onekp.com/project.html) projects provide transcriptome assemblies for taxa representing lineages that are critical for understanding gene family evolution in land plants; mosses, liverworts, lycophytes, monilophytes, and gymnosperms, as well as angiosperms. Here, we use the newly available genomic resources reviewed above to reconstruct the phylogenetic history of GSK3 genes in land plants (embryophytes). We include sequences of two chlorophyte algae as outgroups. Specifically, we: (1) clarify the phylogenetic relationships among land plant GSK3 genes via our greatly increased taxon sampling, (2) reconstruct the history of gene duplication and extinction during land plant diversification, and (3) identify shifts in tissue-preferential expression that may relate to functional diversification in seed plants. Results and discussion Our Maximum Likelihood phylogeny of land plant GSK3 genes (schematic summary in Figure 1, details in Figures 2, 3, 4, 5), rooted with the chlorophyte algae Volvox and Chlamydomonas, is largely congruent with established organismal relationships (e.g. [14,15]). The basal branches constitute a grade of bryophyte sequences, above which the tree topology reveals three ancient gene duplication events along the branches leading to extant tracheophytes (vascular plants), euphyllophytes (monilophytes and seed plants), and spermatophytes (seed plants), respectively (A1-A3, Figure 1). These duplication events together produced four groups of seed plant genes that correspond with the gene groups previously identified in Arabidopsis [5,10]. A subsequent duplication along the branch leading directly to extant angiosperms (A4, Figure 1) produced additional angiosperm-wide gene lineages that we designate as subgroups. Ancestral GSK3 copy number in land plants At the base of the tree, a single gene from the moss Physcomitrella is sister to all other land plant genes, and successive branches lead to a clade of six other genes in the Physcomitrella genome, followed by a clade in which a single Sphagnum (moss) sequence is sister to three sequences from two Marchantia species (liverworts). The branching sequence among these genes implies a duplication event in the ancestral lineage of land plants, with one of the two descendant lineages surviving as a single gene only in Physcomitrella. However, since the available sampling of mosses and liverworts is relatively sparse, the present topology might not accurately represent gene phylogeny. Therefore, origin of the isolated Physcomitrella gene through a more recent duplication, perhaps on the branch leading directly to Physcomitrella or extant mosses, remains feasible. Duplication along the ancestral branch to tracheophytes The first duplication in the land plant lineage of GSK3 genes appears to have occurred along the ancestral branch to tracheophytes (A1 in Figure 1), a clade that emerged during the Silurian period about 415 mya [16]. This tracheophyte duplication produced sister gene lineages (orange bars in Figure 1) whose subsequent histories have resulted in disproportionate representation among extant taxa. The larger descendant lineage includes three of the four groups of seed plant GSK3 genes (I, II, and III), and sequences from Selaginella and Huperzia (lycophytes) are sister to all euphyllophyte genes. Its sister lineage, which includes the Group IV GSK3 genes, must have also originated along the ancestral branch to tracheophytes, but does not include lycophyte sequences (Figures 1 and 2). An alternative scenario in which lycophyte genes are placed sister to all euphyllophyte genes, shifting the A1 duplication to the ancestral branch to euphyllophytes, was rejected by an Approximately Unbiased (AU) test [17], P = Therefore, the Group IV GSK3 gene lineage has been lost from lycophytes sometime during their evolutionary history. The Selaginella genome lacks a Group IV gene, but since the transcriptome data for Huperzia may not be exhaustive, it is still unclear whether the gene loss event pre-dates lycophyte diversification. Duplication along the ancestral branch to euphyllophytes The two loci produced by the tracheophyte duplication have evolved into three euphyllophyte-wide gene lineages Qi et al. BMC Evolutionary Biology 2013, 13:143 Page 3 of 13 Angiosperms I-1 A4 Angiosperms I-2 Gymnosperms I A3 Angiosperms II-1 Gymnosperms II + Amborella A2 Monilophytes I&II Angiosperms III Gymnosperms III-1 Gymnosperms III-2 A1 Monilophytes III Lycophytes Angiosperms IV Gymnosperms IV Figure 1 (See legend on next page.) Monilophytes IV Mosses and Liverworts Chlorophytes Qi et al. BMC Evolutionary Biology 2013, 13:143 Page 4 of 13 (See figure on previous page.) Figure 1 Phylogenetic relationships among land plant GSK3 genes. Four major groups (I - IV) and four major gene duplication events (A1 - A4) are recognized. Numbers above branches indicate bootstrap support values (%). Gene lineages composed of angiosperms, gymnosperms, monilophytes, lycophytes, liverworts, mosses, and algae are labeled. Color bars to the right demarcate gene lineages that originated in the ancestors of extant tracheophytes (red), euphyllophytes (purple), and seed plants (green). (purple bars in Figure 1). Two of these, Group I+II and III) share an immediate sister relationship and therefore originated through a duplication event along the ancestral branch of the euphyllophytes (A2 in Figure 1). The single euphyllophyte-wide gene lineage in the collective sister group of Groups I+II and III, Group IV (Figures 1 and 3), suggests that the above duplication affected only one of the duplicate loci in the euphyllophyte ancestor. A more global duplication event, for example an euphyllophyte whole-genome duplication (WGD), is a less parsimonious scenario that requires loss of one Group IV lineage, prior to the diversification of extant euphyllophytes. Duplication(s) along ancestral branch to spermatophytes Of the three GSK3 loci present in the euphyllophyte ancestor, at least one was subsequently duplicated on the ancestral branch of seed plants, producing four GSK3 gene lineages (demarcated by green bars in Figure 1). This duplication event (A3) is unambiguously inferred by the immediate sister relationship between two lineages of seed Figure 2 Details of phylogenetic relationships among basal land plant GSK3 genes and within the Group IV gene lineage. Upper left insert indicates the position of the depicted phylogeny relative to the overall land plant GSK3 gene tree depicted in Figure 1. Stars correspond to postulated whole-genome duplication events in Table 1. Bootstrap support values are provided adjacent to nodes. Qi et al. BMC Evolutionary Biology 2013, 13:143 Page 5 of 13 Figure 3 Phylogenetic position of lycophytes, and relationships among Group III GSK3 genes. Upper left insert indicates the position of the depicted phylogeny relative to the overall land plant GSK3 gene tree depicted in Figure 1. Stars correspond to postulated whole-genome duplication events in Table 1. Bootstrap support values are provided adjacent to nodes. Qi et al. BMC Evolutionary Biology 2013, 13:143 Page 6 of 13 Figure 4 Phylogenetic relationships within Monilophyte I & II and among Group II GSK3 genes. Upper left insert indicates the position of the depicted phylogeny relative to the overall land plant GSK3 gene tree depicted in Figure 1. Stars correspond to postulated whole-genome duplication events in Table 1. Bootstrap support values are provided adjacent to nodes. Qi et al. BMC Evolutionary Biology 2013, 13:143 Page 7 of 13 Figure 5 Phylogenetic relationships among Group I GSK3 genes. Upper left insert indicates the position of the depicted phylogeny relative to the overall land plant GSK3 gene tree depicted in Figure 1. Stars correspond to postulated whole-genome duplication events numbered in Table 1. Bootstrap support values are provided adjacent to nodes. Qi et al. BMC Evolutionary Biology 2013, 13:143 Page 8 of 13 plant genes, Groups I and II, which are collectively sister to a clade of monilophyte genes (Figures 1 and 4). The A3 duplication coincides with the proposed WGD in the ancestral lineage of extant seed plants, ~320 Ma ago [18], and a synchronous duplication event may have affected the ancestral Group III locus in the seed plant ancestor. The phylogeny of seed plant Group III genes resolves as a single angiosperm lineage (Angiosperm III) and two gymnosperm lineages (Gymnosperm III-1 and III-2) that are paraphyletic with respect to Angiosperm III (Figures 1 and 3). Gymnosperm III-1 includes representatives of all extant gymnosperm lineages (cycadophytes, Ginkgo, gnetophytes and pinophytes), while Gymnosperm III-2 lacks gnetophytes (possibly a sampling artifact), and is sister to the Angiosperm III gene clade (Figure 4). The gene tree therefore implies a gene duplication event on the branch to extant seed plants with subsequent loss of one descendant lineage along the branch leading to extant angiosperms. This inferred Group III seed plant duplication genes would be congruent with that in its sister clade (which produced Groups I and II), increasing the likelihood of a WGD influencing both events. However, the third gene lineage inherited by seed plants from the euphyllophyte ancestor, Group IV, contains no clear evidence of a seed plant WGD. Here, the gene tree resolves as five sequential branches leading to representatives of the ginkgophytes, cycadophytes, pinophytes, gnetophytes, and angiosperms, respectively (Figure 2). Duplication on the ancestral branch to angiosperms Sister angiosperm-wide gene lineages (Angiosperm I-1 and I-2) imply duplication of the ancestral Group I locus along the branch to extant flowering plants with retention of both duplicate copies (A4 in Figures 1 and 5). This duplication coincides with a proposed WGD event that occurred between Mya along the ancestral lineage of angiosperms [18]. Synchronous angiosperm duplications are not obvious for the other angiosperm GSK3 gene lineages, but the two Amborella genes in the Group II clade may be noteworthy. One occupies the expected position at the base of a pan-angiosperm gene lineage (Angiosperm II-1), while the other is placed within a paraphyletic group of gymnosperm genes (Gymnosperm II) (Figure 4). The paraphyly of Gymnosperm II is primarily due to three clades of sequences from conifers, two of which are sister to Ginkgo and gnetophyte sequences, respectively. This topology may be an artifact of inadequate sampling of non-conifer genes rather than a representation of the true gene tree. The placement of an Amborella gene among Gymnosperm II sequences may also be an artifact of phylogeny reconstruction. Otherwise, the gene tree implies that three seed plant clades exist among these Group II genes; one with broad angiosperm and gymnosperm representation, a second represented in Amborella and gymnosperms, and the third represented only in conifers. Perhaps instead, two angiosperm lineages (II-1 and II-2) originated through a single gene duplication event along the branch to extant angiosperms, followed by loss of the Angiosperm II-2 lineage after the separation of Amborella from other flowering plants. On the basis of the other 22 completely sequenced nuclear genomes in our sample (Additional file 1), the Angiosperm II-2 gene lineage would have become extinct early in angiosperm evolution, certainly prior to the divergence of monocots and eudicots. The placement of the surviving Amborella Angiosperm II-2 gene among the Gymnosperm II genes, instead of their sister, could therefore be interpreted as an artifact of phylogeny reconstruction, rather than a reflection of true relationship. Gene family expansion in individual land plant lineages We have identified seven GSK3 genes in the genome sequence of Physcomitrella, two more than previously reported [10], indicating a dramatic increase in gene family members over the course of moss evolution. The genome of the lycophyte Selaginella contains only two GSK3 loci, but a gene loss event may have contributed to this condition (see above). Gene duplication and extinction events are also evident during the diversification of individual euphyllophyte lineages. Monilophytes Clades of five Equisetum diffusum sequences are present in both Groups IV and III genes (Figures 2 and 3), indicating multiple duplications affecting GSK3 loci in this species. Similarly, multiple clades of Asplenium platyneuron, Cyathea spinulosa, and Onoclea sensibilis sequences in Monilophytes I +II and III (Figures 3 and 4) indicate duplications in these leptosporangiate ferns. These duplication events in GSK3 gene lineages are consistent with the widely recognized role of polyploidy in the evolutionary history of monilophyte taxa [19]. Gymnosperms The gymnosperms Ginkgo biloba, Picea glauca, and Welwitschia mirabilis each possess duplicate Group IV GSK3 genes (Figure 2) likely derived from separate duplication events unique to their respective lineages. Relatively recent duplications are evident for the Pinaceae in both clades of Gymnosperm III genes (Figure 3). The Gymnosperm II lineage includes three clades of sequences representing conifers (Figure 4), but uncertainty regarding the relationships of these genes relative to other gymnosperm taxa obscures their evolutionary origin. All Group I gymnosperm sequences form a clade (Gymnosperm I), with separate duplications in gnetophytes, Pinaceae, and Zamia vazquezii (Figure 5). Qi et al. BMC Evolutionary Biology 2013, 13:143 Page 9 of 13 Angiosperms Among the Angiosperm IV group (Figure 2), duplications in Arabidopsis and Glycine max coincide with postulated WGD events for these taxa [20,21] (Table 1). Duplications are also evident in Helianthus annuus, perhaps reflecting an ancient WGD in Heliantheae [22], and Manihot esculenta, which has not been associated with polyploidy. Group IV genes have not been found among non-poaceae monocots, possible reflecting a sampling artifact, but their absence in the sequenced genome of a member of the Ranunculaceae (Aquilegia caerulea) and in extensive transcriptome data for Eschscholzia californica (Papaveraceae) indicates a gene loss event early during the diversification of the Ranunculales. Similar gene loss events are not apparent i
Similar documents
View more...
Search Related
We Need Your Support
Thank you for visiting our website and your interest in our free products and services. We are nonprofit website to share and download documents. To the running of this website, we need your help to support us.

Thanks to everyone for your continued support.

No, Thanks